The progression of science has always been the question of ethics, morality, religion, belief; all the condescending vagaries we have implemented for an empty purpose with no meaning whatsoever.
When the first transplant in the 1950’s was successfully performed, many condescending fucks across the globe, demised and cursed at this considerably celebrated milestone of medical science, instead of the triumph it was expected to harvest, it was said as a despicable act of blasphemy.
Now, to me, that is a fucking load of crap.
All these lifeless religious bastards, all so wise and revered, with their moustaches and round rimmed specs played bitch to science.
Now that is betrayal of the human intellect.
Because if a person cannot accept science as a study of theories and proof, and religion as a cultural theory and controlled moral teachings (mind you, this is my subjective opinion, so any of you out there who think/feel otherwise and/or pissed, and you want to do all you want to preach about how your personal concept of universal preferable behavior/perception, spare it, if you’re ever trying to impart, or enforce, or even just share anything at all with someone, just understand that people have opinions too, at least, that’s what I think), then that person is one selfish, ignorant cunt who deserves to have rusty nails embedded in his/her body then sewed into the stomach of a cow along with a dog, a snake and a monkey, then thrown into deep water, oh the roman beauty.
But hell, I was trying to research more studies on nanotechnology when I came across a list of ethics to be practiced when dealing with nanotech.
I mean, science should never be about ethics considering it is a study of the natural world and its progressing, modern counterparts, is it not?
And since almost every thing in the universe is considered part of the natural world, then ethics should not be in question or practiced.
We didn’t advance in medical science if we’d thought that cutting up a body and its muscles and tissues to remove cancer and tumours, or whichever anomaly we might have if we thought it was mean to a person if we were to cut them up a little.
We wouldn’t have understood the anatomy of anything if we didn’t cut them up either.
In fact, all along, I’d think science is a game of risks we have to be willing to take.
Where would we have been if not for anesthetics, if not for finding what would kill that viscous matter from eating at our lacerations.
Ethics are a deep, deep incision that slows science from moving along.
Ah well, if that’s how it’s going to be, might as well not care about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment